Monday, 26 July 2021
Thursday, 22 July 2021
Waste Collection Service
We have received lots of complaints recently about the waste collection service.
TMBC have reassured us that they are using every possible clause in the contract (including issuing fines and defaults to the contractor) to ensure that Urbaser collect bins at the right time, but it's clear that the service is not up to standard.
We will continue to press TMBC and Urbaser to get the service back to the level that we all expect.
Whilst there have been some genuine reasons for missed bins collection, including the national shortage of HGV drivers, as referenced by ITV : https://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2021-07-21/hgv-shortage-hits-the-souths-supermarkets-as-haulage-firm-describe-heartbreak , it's clear that Urbaser have been struggling with the contract for some time and there are problems that run much deeper than this.
You can check for waste updates from TMBC here : https://www.tmbc.gov.uk/bins-waste/check-waste-collection-updates/1
As your local councillors we will put every effort into making sure that the council and the contractor work together to resolve these problems.
Thursday, 5 March 2020
The future of the former Co-op stores
Friday, 14 February 2020
Parking in Snodland
At this stage, it is important to emphasise that TMBC (the car park owner) are not even at a consultation stage yet. There was originally a proposal to have a consultation now, but this was postponed after the intervention of myself and Cllr Sue Bell who pointed out that the knock on effect on parking in the centre of the town, and in particular along Malling Road, could be considerable.
Therefore, we have persuaded TMBC to do a review of parking in the town to identify potential additional spaces and to see if all of the current road restrictions are required. There will also be an opportunity for people to request a residents parking scheme, if they want one.
There is also an obvious need to make sure that the car park is not abused by people who park there all day (such as commuters and some SE Water employees) and reduce the number of spaces available for visitors and residents.
Whatever happens, it is clear that something needs to be done as the car park is not serving the community. When I took some time to observe the car movements on a mid-week morning recently, during the 45 minutes that I was there, not a single car left the car park. It was absolutely full and there were 14 cars that arrived who were unable to park. This cannot be good for local businesses who need a turnover of spaces so that their customers can park without having to drive round in circles.
The consultation on charging is not likely to happen until June (at the earliest), but when the consultation goes live, I am happy to host a public meeting so that residents can make their views known.
The cost of running the car park is considerable (about £23,000 per year) which is made up of business rates, maintenance, CCTV monitoring, Civil Enforcement Officer salaries and other administrative costs. Whilst the motivation behind the idea to introduce a charge is not primarily financial (but about managing the parking to achieve a turnover of spaces), the council does have a duty to ensure that the charges for the services it provides are made fairly on a borough-wide basis. Car parks are one such service to which this applies. Under the law, the council has no duty to provide car parking spaces, but it does have the power to do so where it will benefit communities’ local economy.
The Council owns many car parks across the Borough, and most of them attract a fee for their use. Therefore, TMBC does have to be mindful that the running costs of car parks where there is a charge are paid for by the users of that car park. We have to consider whether it is fair for those users to pay for their own car parks AND to subsidise (through their council tax) free parking in other areas of the Borough. Likewise, is it fair for public transport users to subsidise free car parking?
In 2017, TMBC corrected the long-standing unfairness of Snodland residents paying for services in Tonbridge that would normally be carried out by a Parish or Town Council. However, as Tonbridge has no Town Council, it fell to TMBC to pay for those services. This was stopped when Tonbridge residents were asked to pay “Special Expenses” for Tonbridge local services in the same way Snodland residents pay a separate Council Tax charge to Snodland Town Council. However, having done this, Tonbridge residents are now quite rightly pointing out that the boot is on the other foot in regard to car parks!
When TMBC introduced car parking charges in West Malling, there was lot of public opposition and residents were concerned that it would cause local businesses to fold. That has proved not to be the case and the town centre is as thriving as ever, with shop vacancy rates at 3%, compared to 11% nationally. My personal view is that a small charge will not drive people away to other towns; this hasn’t happened in other places. The convenience of shopping in your local village outweighs the time spent in travelling elsewhere. Additionally, it would cost more in petrol to drive to another town to find the same services than it would to simply pay the 20p for half an hour parking (that’s just an indicative figure).
Ultimately, there are no easy solutions to this problem, but when the consultation begins, we do want to hear your views!
Councillor David Lettington
Monday, 25 September 2017
An update on Holborough Lakes fire.
Tuesday, 19 September 2017
The fire at Holborough Lakes
It is clearly absolutely devastating for the families affected; many have lost their homes and treasured possessions. The shock of seeing flames engulf your home cannot be understated. The feelings of sadness for those families are also mixed with an immense relief that no lives were lost and that there were no serious injuries.
The emergency services responded swiftly, which undoubtedly saved lives, and have acted with total professionalism and compassion for the residents. Likewise, I wanted to thank staff from TMBC Building Control who worked with Kent & Fire and Rescue Service to establish the extent of the structural damage, and to the Housing Officers who gave advice to residents about their rehoming options.
People who have been following the ongoing parking saga at Holborough will know that I don't always agree with the actions of Berkeley Homes, but I have to say that both Berkeley and their managing agent RMG have responded brilliantly and, where those affected could not stay with friends or family then Berkeley have paid for them to stay in a local hotel.
The community have also been incredibly generous, there were more donations than could be handled and there has also been a JustGiving page set up ( www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/holboroughlakesfire ) that has raised over £3000 at the time of writing.
It is apparent that the whole block will need to be rebuilt - the damage from fire and water is too significant to permit repairs, even on the lower levels.
I'm sure there will be further information coming forward in the next few weeks, but for now I just wanted to say a big thank you to the community for all of the support that has been given to everyone that has been affected.
Sunday, 5 February 2017
An update after the Holborough Lakes parking public meeting
This morning we sent this email to residents who attended the Holborough Lakes parking public meeting:
Many thanks for your feedback.
There were nearly 70 residents at the recent Holborough Lakes parking meeting, with 24 people completing the questionnaire.
The response to the first question was as follows:
The response to the first question was as follows:
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects your view: | |
- I am completely happy with the road markings at Holborough Lakes and would like them to be enforced according to the markings. | 3 |
- I am generally happy with the road markings but think improvements could be made. | 4 |
- I am generally unhappy with the road markings but would like to see some adjustments. | 8 |
- I am very unhappy with the road markings and would like to see significant changes. | 9 |
I am seeing Berkeley on Tuesday and will give them feedback from the meeting.
KCC also need to decide whether they will instruct Berkeley to remove the lines in areas without TROs (or just remove the lines themselves).
There was a wide range of responses to the other questions in the questionnaire, and here is a selection of comments:
"This is not a family friendly estate. More disabled spaces required"
"Parking problems in Holborough Lakes cause problems in Holborough Road too"
"Cars must be kept off pavements"
"Staggered lines on main routes [would help]"
"More parking bays where possible. Compromise is needed"
"I would like double yellow lines to be enforced"
"Roadside parking should be allowed"
"More provision of visitor parking [is needed], especially in phase 1 & 2"
"We are fed up with Berkeley Homes not considering the views of residents"
"The yellow lines will not work. People need to be able to have family and friends visit"
"Yellow lines need to be added where there are cobbled areas"
"it is very important that there is parking control over the whole of the development"
"Enforce parking restrictions at the nursery"
"Staggered parking needs to be in place on the main roads to create more spaces"
"Please consider that we would like to have family round without a parking nightmare"
"We do not need this strict, unnecessary enforcement"
"A blanket of yellow lines is not the answer".
I will keep you updated when I have further information from KCC and Berkeley.
Cllr David Lettington, on behalf of Snodland Conservatives
www.snodland-conservatives.blogspot.co.uk
www.facebook.com/SnodlandTories/
Twitter: @SnodlandTories